琼东北晚新生代断裂活动及其对东寨港沉降的控制作用
    点此下载全文
引用本文:丁莹莹,赵希涛,胡道功,张绪教,王超群,胡正旺,夏蒙蒙,吴环环,游报捷,常鹏渊.2018.琼东北晚新生代断裂活动及其对东寨港沉降的控制作用[J].地球学报,39(2):155-166.
DOI:10.3975/cagsb.2017.112601
摘要点击次数: 4491
全文下载次数: 1858
作者单位E-mail
丁莹莹 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院中国地质科学院地质力学研究所 dingyingying555@sina.com 
赵希涛 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所  
胡道功 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所
国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室 
hudg@263. net 
张绪教 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院  
王超群 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院中国地质科学院地质力学研究所  
胡正旺 中国地质大学(武汉)地球物理与空间信息学院  
夏蒙蒙 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所  
吴环环 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所  
游报捷 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院  
常鹏渊 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院  
基金项目:中国地质调查局地质调查项目“泛珠三角地区活动构造与区域地壳稳定性调查”(编号: DD20160269)
中文摘要:琼东北的1605年琼州7.5级大地震曾导致大面积陆陷成海。前人研究多关注陆陷成海机制, 但对该区晚新生代断裂活动及其控制下的沉降过程与构造机制一直缺乏深入研究。在地质调查基础上, 结合钻孔揭露和大地电磁探测(EH4)结果等资料发现, 东寨港地区自西向东可分为演丰火山岩台地、东寨港潟湖平原和锦山剥蚀台地三个构造地貌单元, 并且不同地貌单元间明显受到区域上北西向正断层活动的控制。根据86个钻孔资料制作的东寨港地区新近纪以来不同时期沉积物等厚度图显示, 该区的沉积中心从新近纪以来存在由西向东迁移过程, 沉积速率也存在明显的变化。中—上新世、早更新世、晚更新世和全新世平均沉积速率分别为12 mm/ka、10 mm/ka、67 mm/ka和1 922 mm/ka, 显示中更新世之后沉积速率骤然增大, 并在全新世达到最大。综合分析认为, 北西向铺前—清澜断裂第四纪正断层活动控制了东寨港地堑的发育与东寨港陆陷成海及其震后地壳持续下沉; 东寨港凹陷晚更新世以来处于快速加积过程中; 相邻的锦山剥蚀台地长期以来处于相对稳定或微隆升状态, 并很可能属于雷琼凹陷之外的构造地块, 雷琼凹陷是否应囊括锦山剥蚀台地值得进一步研究和商榷。
中文关键词:海南岛  雷琼凹陷  新构造运动  活动断裂  铺前—清澜断裂
 
Late Cenozoic Fault Activity in Northeastern Hainan Island and Its Controlling Effect on Tectonic Subsidence in Dongzhai Port
Abstract:The Qiongzhou great earthquake of magnitude 7.5 in 1605 caused extensive land subsidence into the sea. Previous studies have paid much attention to the land subsidence lagoon plain and Jinshan eroded platform, which are controlled by the regional NW-trending faults. The se-dimentation thickness map based on data of 86 drill holes at different stages since the Neogene was compiled, which shows that the sedimentation center is transferred from the west bank to the east bank and the average deposition rates also have significant change. The average deposition rates of the Mesozoic–Pliocene, Early Pleistocene, Late Pleistocene and Holocene were 12 mm/ka, 10 mm/ka, 67 mm/ka and 1 922 mm/ka respectively, which suggests that the deposition rate was slow before the Middle Pleistocene, began to increase suddenly in the Late Pleistocene, and probably reached the maximum since the Holocene. Some conclusions have been reached: (1) The Dongzhai port graben was mainly controlled by NW-trending Quaternary normal Puqian–Qinglan fault that also controlled the development of Dongzhai port graben, its subsidence into the sea and its continuous sink. (2) The subsidence of Dongzhai port depression has been accelerated since the Late Pleistocene. (3) Jinshan eroded platform has been long in a stable or slightly uplift state, and is likely to belong to the tectonic block outsidethe Lei–Qiong Depression. The problem whether the Leiqiong depression includes Jinshan eroded platform deserves further study.mechanism, but there is still a lack of in-depth study of the fault activities as well as the process and the mechanism of tectonic subsidence since the Late Cenozoic. Based on field investigation, drill hole data and EH4 inversion analysis, the authors divided the Dongzhai port area into three tectonic geomorphologic units, namely, Yanfeng volcanic platform, Dongzhai
keywords:Hainan Island  Leiqiong depression  neotectonic movement  active fault  Puqian–Qinglan fault
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
版权所有 《地球学报》编辑部 Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
主管单位:中国地质调查局 主办单位:中国地质科学院
地址: 北京市西城区百万庄大街26号,中国地质科学院东楼317室 邮编:100037 电话:010-68327396 E-mail: diqiuxb@126.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
京ICP备05029128号-6

京公网安备 11010202007616号